Space-Time Chair

Overview

The Space-Time Chair apparatus is reported to have been developed as a tool for inducing controlled space-time shifts, out-of-body experiences, and Remote Viewing operations. Accounts suggest that at least two units are located on Long Island, New York—one at the well-known underground Montauk facility, and another in Southampton—while a third setup, nicknamed the “Thames Chair,” is in Britain near the Thames River.

The Montauk installation is described as being located roughly a quarter to a third of a mile underground, with a tunnel large enough for vehicular traffic. In an abduction testimony, the chair systems open portals through space-time, projecting consciousness beyond the body, and enabling perceptions that include interplanetary landscapes (such as Mars) and access to information normally outside of human awareness. A recurring theme is that the apparatus was designed to bypass the normal constraints of timing and transmission that would otherwise hinder long-distance communication or perception. Some operators claim that those who passed through the Montauk program can be identified by subtle changes in their aura—suggesting lasting physiological or electromagnetic sensitivities. One abductee, Duncan Cameron, described how this sensitivity acted like a key to “zones of information” comparable to a localized Akashic field.

Purpose of the Long Island Chairs

The decision to maintain two chairs in separate Long Island locations appears to have been both practical and experimental. The Montauk underground system provided a secure, shielded environment for high-intensity operations, while the Southampton chair offered an above-ground reference point. Together, they enabled calibration across a long link, serving as paired anchors to validate signal integrity and timing.

The two installations also provided redundancy: if one system became unstable, the other could still maintain continuity. Additionally, different hardware generations were compared—early Delta coil systems versus later Delta-T receiver configurations—allowing researchers to study environmental influences, test parallel configurations, and measure performance differences under distinct conditions.

Hardware and Configuration

Accounts of the hardware describe a specialized coil arrangement around the subject’s body, positioned at the head, feet, and additional axes above and below. These coils were wired to three advanced receivers said to trace their lineage back to 1930s designs, built around Delta coil structures. Synchronization was crucial: the system employed oscillators, phantom-lock concepts (similar to those used by ITT Makay), and RCA receiver technology, with six output channels processing the data.

The front end was described as a Delta-T design, where the coils were phased and tuned to reduce external interference, an important factor in maintaining operation inside the dense electromagnetic environment of Montauk without introducing timing glitches. Witnesses suggest the system was essentially an advanced evolution of earlier “lockup” communication technologies, but re-engineered with a more sophisticated architecture capable of extending perception beyond ordinary human limits.

Implications

If the claims surrounding the Space-Time Chair are accurate, the implications are far-reaching. The system would represent a technological bridge between consciousness and physics, functioning not only as a communications tool but as a gateway for direct interaction with information fields beyond space-time. Remote viewing across planetary distances, contact with non-ordinary intelligences, or even the opening of portals are all reported functions.

From a strategic standpoint, the existence of such devices would explain longstanding secrecy and compartmentalization within Cold War and post-Cold War programs: a working system of this kind would provide unmatched intelligence-gathering and possibly even covert transport capabilities. On the human level, the reports of altered physiology and aura signatures among participants suggest lasting changes in the energy-body interface, raising questions about both the risks and transformative potential of exposure to such technology.